Skip to content
An advertisement for an Apple Inc. iPod is displayed on the side of a London bus in London, U.K., on Friday, Dec. 21, 2012. Britain's economy expanded less than previously estimated in the third quarter and the budget deficit unexpectedly widened in November, complicating Prime Minister David Cameron's attempts to bolster the recovery. Photographer: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg via Getty Images
An advertisement for an Apple Inc. iPod is displayed on the side of a London bus in London, U.K., on Friday, Dec. 21, 2012. Britain’s economy expanded less than previously estimated in the third quarter and the budget deficit unexpectedly widened in November, complicating Prime Minister David Cameron’s attempts to bolster the recovery. Photographer: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Author
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

Reluctantly taking the stand, an ex-Apple engineer testified on Friday that he worked on a project meant to shut competitors out of iTunes.

Rod Schultz s testimony came at the tail-end of a two-week trial in Oakland federal court over Apple s dominance of digital music. Plaintiffs subpoenaed Schultz, who reported to court in an untucked dress shirt and a leather jacket, according to the Wall Street Journal. Schultz readily admitted that he had not wanted to talk about his work at Apple, a portion of which was code-named Candy.

He testified that the project was meant to  block 100% of non-iTunes clients and keep out third-party players, according to the Wall Street Journal, echoing plaintiffs key argument in the long-running case. Plaintiffs argue that Apple repeatedly updated iTunes solely to drive out competitors, orchestrating a monopoly that enabled it to sell iPods at inflated prices. Plaintiffs seek $350 million in damages, which could be tripled under antitrust laws.

But Schultz agreed with Apple that that the software updates delivered several improvements — one of the company s key rebuttals to the plaintiffs claims.

After a rough-and-tumble trial that included an eleventh-hour search for a plaintiff, the antitrust case will soon be handed to a federal jury. Both sides will deliver their closing arguments later today.

Above: Apple is ensnared in a trial that dates back to the iPod s heyday (Simon Dawson, Bloomberg/Getty Images).