Tag archive for ‘Litigation’
Posted by Jack Davis on July 31st, 2009 at 3:52 pm | Categorized as Docu-Drama, VirnetX | Tagged as Litigation, Microsoft, Patents, VirnetX
Shares of VirnetX, the developer of Internet-calling and instant messaging software that sued Microsoft in 2007 claiming the software giant infringed three of its patents, doubled in value today after the Scotts Valley company reported that the federal court hearing the suit had issued a “Markman” order that adopted interpretations of the patent claim language that it Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a comment
Posted by Jack Davis on June 11th, 2009 at 3:28 pm | Categorized as Docu-Drama, Patents, VirnetX | Tagged as Litigation, McKool Smith, Microsoft, Patents, VirnetX
VirnetX, the Scotts Valley supplier of tools for securing real-time communications over the Internet, has hired a Texas-based law firm with a track record of fighting Microsoft in court to represent it in its current suit against the software giant.
McKool Smith will now lead VirnetX’s litigation effort in a suit brought against Microsoft in February 2007 Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a comment
Posted by Jack Davis on June 9th, 2009 at 2:41 pm | Categorized as Backdating, Docu-Drama, Marvell Technology, Options | Tagged as Backdating, Litigation, Marvell Technology, Shareholder lawsuits, Weili Dai
Marvell Technology, the Bermuda-based chip company that operates out of Santa Clara, said today that it has agreed to resolve a shareholder class action lawsuit filed in August 2007 related to the way the company granted stock options in the past.
The company will pay $72 million and has decided Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a comment
Posted by Jack Davis on May 14th, 2009 at 12:23 pm | Categorized as Docu-Drama, Exponent | Tagged as Exponent, Litigation, Patents
Exponent, which bills itself as “an engineering and scientific consulting firm that provides solutions to complex problems”, may have to forego $740,000 owed it by Chrysler, the troubled (is there any other kind these days?) auto manufacturer that filed for bankruptcy protection last month.
The fact was noted in the company’s quarterly financial form known as a 10-Q, which it filed Wednesday. Exponent said that the ultimate loss, Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a comment
Posted by Jack Davis on September 3rd, 2008 at 4:03 pm | Categorized as Adept Technology, Buyback, Hirings, Litigation, Real Estate | Tagged as Adept Technology, Executive Pay, Hirings, Litigation, Real Estate, Stock Buybacks
Adept Technology, the Livermore maker of manufacturing robotics, is set to go to court Sept. 16 to try and stop its eviction from its headquarter facilities in the Tri-Valley Technology Center on Triad Drive, according to one of its SEC filings Wednesda. It’s landlord, who gave the company notice back in April that it wished to terminate its lease, and saying that the company owed it a $1 million “termination fee.” The July deadline came and went with Adept still occupying the space. A second termination notice was served giving the company until Aug. 26 to vacacte the premises, which Adept still has not done. Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a comment
Posted by Jack Davis on August 6th, 2008 at 1:06 pm | Categorized as Hirings, Patents, Tessera Technologies | Tagged as Hirings, Litigation, Patents, Tessera Technologies
Tessera Technologies, the San Jose developer of electronics miniaturization technologies, said it has a new chief executive, “effective immediately”, according to a regulatory filing Wednesday. Taking over is Hank Nothhaft, currently vice chairman of Tessera’s board.
Outgoing CEO Bruce McWilliams, who is “transitioning to a new role as Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a comment
Posted by Jack Davis on August 1st, 2008 at 12:25 pm | Categorized as Lawsuit, Litigation, Mergers and Acquisitions | Tagged as 3Com, Litigation, Mergers and Acquisitions
3Com said in a filing today it has filed suit against Bain Capital Partners Thursday in an effort to collect a $66 million “termination fee” it says it is owed from the private equity firm after Bain terminated its planned acquisition of the former Silicon Valley company that’s now headquartered in Marlborough, Mass.
The $2.2 billion deal agreed to last September was terminated by Bain in March, a day before Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a comment
Posted by Jack Davis on July 25th, 2008 at 7:00 am | Categorized as Accounting, Apple, Sun Microsystems, Synopsys | Tagged as Accounting, American Bar Association, Apple, Association of Corporate Counsel, Daniel Cooperman, FASB, Litigation, Michael Dillon, Sun Microsystems, Synopsys, Wilson Sonsini
General counsels of several Silicon Valley corporations are in the vanguard of critics railing against changes being proposed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board “”that would force public companies to disclose more about the risks of litigation,” judging by the sources in this story by Zusha Elinson of the San Francisco Recorder.
“Under the revised rules for FASB Statement No. 5,” Elinson writes, “the threshold for reporting the potential loss from a lawsuit would be lowered from ‘probable’ to Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a comment
Posted by Jack Davis on July 24th, 2008 at 3:33 pm | Categorized as Earnings miss, Earnings news, Litigation, Patents, Rambus | Tagged as Earnings news, Layoffs, Litigation, Patents, Rambus
Rambus said it intends to “reduce our current cost structure through actions which may include downsizing our workforce” after reporting a 25 percent drop in sales for its second quarter compared with the year-before quarter, according to its earnings release this afternoon.
The company’s net loss ballooned to Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a comment
Posted by Jack Davis on July 1st, 2008 at 9:00 pm | Categorized as Monolithic Power | Tagged as Linear Technology, Litigation, Monolithic Power, Patents
Monolithic Power says it was victorious in a contract dispute with Linear Technology, according to a press release it sent out late Tuesday evening.
Monolithic did not breach an October 1, 2005, agreement with Linear Technology that was a subject of the litigation, according to the release. Nor did it “willfully infringe” against the patent claims in the case of two patents asserted by Linear that were used in a Monolithic Power product that had been discontinued “more than 18 months earlier.”
However, Read the rest of this entry »
Leave a comment