« Previous entry | Home | Next entry »

Roundup: Flock finally cutting deals, Google no longer objective, and more...

Here's the latest Silicon Valley action.

flock.jpg
Flock cuts deal with Photobucket -- Flock, the Silicon Valley-based browser company, hasn't enjoyed the kind traction that the other new browser, Maxthon, is getting. And it's still way behind Firefox in adoption. It's a young pup, so you'd expect it to take time. Now Photobucket, the leading photo Web site has has launched a free Web browser -- using Flock as its back-end -- to make it easier for customers to drag and drop pictures and do other things. The danger until now is that Flock would languish, limited to geek users. If general users of Photobucket start downloading Flock, this could be the breakthrough they needed.

Electric sports-car company Wrightspeed looking for venture money -- Ian Wright, who left the electric sports-car company, Tesla, to start his own company, Wrightspeed, last year, is competing for the same $3 billion market for high-performance sports cars, he tells the AP. The New Zealand-born electrical engineer said he is still raising its first round of financing and remains a one-man startup: Many venture capitalists are "serious car nuts" but are nervous about investing in a car company because they don't know enough about the industry, Wright said. (There's also the lingering question VCs will have about why he left Tesla).

Is Google becoming a server company, and is it giving up being objective? -- Good story in the NYT, and well summarized by Paul Kedrosky about how Google is among chip manufacturer AMD's five largest clients, and is the largest customer that does not make computers to resell; how Google appears to be considering getting into semiconductor design, and how Google is the fourth largest maker of servers in the world, after Dell, HP, and IBM. That is surprising, for a search company.

Moreover, a CNET story points to Google's argument in a legal case that it is not an objective search engine. David Kramer, a Wilson Sonsini attorney representing Google, said the search giant's PageRank system is subjective:

...using a combination of reviews into whether a Web site is adhering to its guidelines and is worth a user's time to view. "Google is constantly evaluating Web sites for standards and quality, which is entirely subjective," Kramer said.

The judge probed Kramer on the topic of whether Google engages in misleading behavior, and whether it uses objective criteria to evaluate sites--rather than solely relying on subjective reasoning....Kramer, however, said Google readers understand that the site's ranking system is subjective and based on Google's opinion about whether a site is worth viewing.

(Via Battelle.)

Finally, the Shanghai Securities News reports Google has started an on-line book search service in China, signing cooperation agreements with four publishing houses in China.

Infinera to go public? -- Infinera is a Sunnyvale optical networking company that boasts it has a better way. It is one of the more ballsy bets in this sector: VCs have pumped roughly $203 million into the company since 2001. Now word is that it may be preparing to go public. Infinera has just named a new chief financial officer, and when we called for comment, their PR person got back to us saying they couldn't comment on strategy -- a sign something could be up, given the company has commented in the past when we've called. Infinera says it can do the entire light-to-light conversion in optical transport on two chips -- for less than half the cost. It says it now has seven customers.



Trackbacks
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.siliconbeat.com/cgi-bin/mt331/mt-tb.cgi/1541

Links to blogs that reference this entry:

From: Cutting
Cutting
Excerpt: Number 1 in metal working tools, representation in over 50 countries. Directions, map, photos, and faci...
Tracked: July 27, 2006 3:16 AM
From: SiliconBeat
Infinera, fiber-optic company, raises $110M -- to go public?
Excerpt: Infinera, the Sunnyvale company that claims it is transforming the process of data switching on high-speed telecommunications networks, has raised at least $110 million in a seventh round of funding, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission f...
Tracked: July 27, 2006 5:34 AM

Comments

I would not say that Photobucket "[uses] Flock as its back-end". The Flock, Photobucket Edition is the full featured Flock with the photo features configured for Photobucket by default.

It is flattering for Flock to be compared to the two excellent browsers Maxthon and Firefox. Maxthon has been around for about 2 years, compared to Flock's one year, so I am not sure that Maxthon is "the other new browser".

Lloyd D Budd on July 5, 2006 2:13 PM
Comment link

///using a combination of reviews into whether a Web site is adhering to its guidelines and is worth a user's time to view. "Google is constantly evaluating Web sites for standards and quality, which is entirely subjective,"


This may in Fact explain why - although not Banned - some sites have taken ENORMOUS declines in their keyword rankings for competative keywords.

and in the process - have lost their rankings for even insignificant keywords, as well as the other pages in that domain

It is possibly a progamming change that Google can issue againt ANY domain that simply neuters its' relationship to the database


Take a look at this three year achive for the term SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION

http://www.googlealert.com/browse.php?f=c&u=5urlcom&c=322fb77&t=all&s=0&a=&r=g


See the winners & Losers over the years - obviously some of the loosers lost because their SEO tactics were disapproved of - you simply do not Disappear off the charts completely and not be banned

In many cases BANNING is in fact manual and subjective (aka not conforming to webmaster guidelines)


Search Engines WEB on July 5, 2006 3:22 PM
Comment link

Matt,

Thanks for the kind words. Just wanted to point out that Maxthon is not quite a new browser - they've been around, as MyIE2, since 2002 or so. That's not to detract from their success - my understanding is that they do in fact have several million active users in China.

bart decrem on July 6, 2006 3:36 PM
Comment link

fair enough. and three years' headstart is significant. i thought they launched in 04, which is already enough of a difference.

Matt Marshall on July 7, 2006 4:08 AM
Comment link
Post a comment












Remember personal info?