Wavion's WiFi access points cold help Google in SF
It has been in stealth until now. It says it is not too late for Google to consider using Wavion access points to wire San Francisco.
It is backed with $22 million from big-name venture capital firm Sequoia Capital, as well as Elron Electronics, Star Ventures and BRM Capital.
Wavion says it delivers stronger connections at higher speeds, and with fewer dead spots. One
Wavion access point does the work of three to four conventional action points, which lowers costs for service providers, the company says. Click on graphic below for comparisons; Wavion is on right, convention access point is on left.
The company says conventional metro WiFi installations require a dense deployment of access points, and that is why Google has been delayed in meshing San Francisco with WiFi.
Founded in 2002, the company uses what it calls MIMO (Multiple In, Multiple Out) technology. Each access point has six antennas, and they each have transceivers that are both transmitting and receiving. The company's scientists did their PhDs at Stanford in the early 1980s, including early work on smart antenna technology.
http://www.siliconbeat.com/cgi-bin/mt32/mt-tb.cgi/1391
Links to blogs that reference this entry:
Doesn't the giant Cisco have any offerings in this space that we are starting to see so many players in the wireless market?
Regards,
Startups.in
Comment link
matt - your link to WiFi issues here:
http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/05/04/googles_internet_access_investment_current_raises_130m_more_sf_wifi_delayed.html
is incorrect - that delay refers to the Mtn View install, San Francisco hasn't even begun negotiating the contract with Earthlink/Google. Also San Francisco asked for 95% outdoor, 90% indoor coverage - a much higher standard than the Mtn View setup.
see more at my blog
http://www.webnetic.net
Comment link
Also on this Wavion deal:
It does not solve the Muni indoor WiFi issue nor does the url for the company website work.
Kimo Crossman on May 22, 2006 03:42 AMComment link
URL works now.
Matt Marshall on May 22, 2006 05:23 AMComment link