« Previous entry | Home | Next entry »

Silicon Valley start-ups help NTP squeeze Blackberry

(Update: Visto has since sued Microsoft for allegedly infringing upon multiple patents Visto holds regarding proprietary technology that provides consumers with mobile access to their e-mail and data. Visto claims Microsoft's Windows Mobile 5.0 infringes on three of its patents that provide users with access to corporate e-mail servers on their mobile devices.)

Techdirt has a little summary of how two Silicon Valley start-ups, Visto and Good, are allying with NTP to put pressure on Blackberry's parent, Research in Motion. It is a new sort of sophisticated dual track investment-legal strategy we haven't seen much of before.

Visto, a smaller rival to Research In Motion in the mobile e-mail market, said today it had licensed the patents of NTP, the company involved in a long-running patent dispute with RIM. Like its deal with Good Technology, NTP has taken an equity stake in Visto. It's not clear if it got the stake in exchange for licensing the patents, but the wording of the Visto press release makes it sound like the stake was acquired separately. If this is the case, NTP would be propping up both Good and Visto, essentially giving them money to license the patents in hopes of turning up the pressure on RIM to settle. The Patent Office continues to move toward rejecting NTP's patents, while things look grim for RIM in the courts. We noted with the Good deal that NTP's investment seemed a little fishy; so does its taking a stake in Visto. Clearly NTP wants to force a settlement with RIM as quickly as it can, before the Patent Office acts definitively. That doesn't engender much faith that its patents are actually valid.


Trackbacks
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.siliconbeat.com/cgi-bin/mt331/mt-tb.cgi/962

Links to blogs that reference this entry:

From: Squeez
Squeez
Excerpt: Brace either by trimming with scissors or filing with the emery board. Guest conductor, Colleen Bertsch : Music available online (free)...
Tracked: August 8, 2006 8:19 AM

Comments

I have been following this case and like your conclusion. This patent cases has been crazy: NTP seems to want a quick settlement based on projected sales to 2012 (projected anything seems dubious in the tech space), while the Patent Office is questioning the patents in their review.

All of this makes Research in Motion less willing to settle, but ultimately potential Blackberry customers may hold off their purchases and look around, to Research in Motion's detriment.

So, from RIMM's perspective, a small current payment and royalty on actual future sales seems preferable (assume no payment if the patents are ruled invalid).

So how does this end up? I don't know.

Kelley Ritchey on December 19, 2005 1:35 AM
Comment link

The other interesting factor in this is the Government's statement of interest regarding the case. Basically, the Government emphasized the need for Congress, the Federal Government, State Governments, Local Governments, and first responders to be exempted from any injunction.

Wonder how long that white-list would take to assemble?

Combine that with the fact that the USPTO has fast-tracked the final rulings on the patents and I think we can see why RIMM is playing stall-ball.

directorblue on December 19, 2005 5:00 AM
Comment link
Post a comment












Remember personal info?