« Previous entry | Home | Next entry »

VCs pump more money into Flock

Updated

bart decrem3.bmpFlock's chief executive, Bart Decrem, reports that his Palo Alto browser start-up Flock has raised fresh capital from Bessemer, Catamount and a bunch of angels.

Worth keeping an eye on this company. We reported on them here.

Now Wired has done a piece, and generating buzz that has baffled David Cowan, the investor over at Bessemer. Namely, the Flock product isn't even out yet.

Update: VentureWire reports (sub required) that this latest round, Flock's so-called "A round," was $2 million.


Trackbacks
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.siliconbeat.com/cgi-bin/mt331/mt-tb.cgi/702

Links to blogs that reference this entry:

From: Business Logs
Flock and Web 2.0: The Leaning Tower of Buzz
Excerpt: Well everybody, if you haven't been seeing PR praise for Flock on the interweb then you must have been living under a Web 1.0 rock for awhile. Wired has praised it, Bessemer Venture Partners and many others gave them tons...
Tracked: October 6, 2005 11:09 PM
From: PaidContent.org
Funding news: YouTube's $5 Million; Sphere's $0.5 Million; Flock's $2 Million
Excerpt: : These fundings have not yet been announced, hence lumping them together for now. Also, they're of the Web 2.0 variety: -- Youtube: Youtube is on online video upload and sharing site ("Flickr of video") and Om reported recently that...
Tracked: October 14, 2005 11:14 AM
From: sportbook
sportbook
Excerpt: sportbook
Tracked: March 27, 2006 3:24 AM

Comments

Waste of money. These VCs are throwing away money just like in the .com years. When will they learn their lesson.

Harzan on September 15, 2005 11:52 AM
Comment link

I think the VCs will learn someday when they stop making double or triple digit returns on their successful investments (which disproportionately offsets the "failed" investments you are referring to). Until then, they will continue to make bets on companies and concepts that show promise: some will surely fail and some will succeed greatly.

Geoffrey on September 16, 2005 12:13 PM
Comment link

The photo above looks like one of my photos
http://www.flickr.com/photos/foolswisdom/43144700/ . I license my photos under a non-commercial license and you run ads on your site, so you may be in violation of my license.

If you had contacted me, I would have been happy to let you use the photo. I would have asked you to link to the original.

No harm done, but please do not do it again,
Lloyd

Lloyd D Budd on October 17, 2005 12:41 AM
Comment link

Lloyd,

Thanks for the note. Apologies. We looked at the license info at your site, and we obviously misunderstood it. Our bad. Photo has been replaced!

Matt Marshall on October 17, 2005 8:19 AM
Comment link
Post a comment












Remember personal info?