« Previous entry | Home | Next entry »

The non-scandal at Technology Crossover Ventures

Jeff Nolan, via Cotton Green, reports about an apparent conflict of interest at Silicon Valley (Palo Alto) venture firm, Technology Crossover Ventures.

Technology Crossover Ventures recently made news by being part of the syndicate that funded an anti-spyware company, Webroot ($108m in a first round of investment), but the firm also invested in an adware company, Claria, formerly known as Gator.

...So on one hand they invest in a company that contributes to a problem solved by another. I sense that the TCV folks are a little sensitive to this perception as well, they recently removed Claria from their portfolio company listing on their website, although thanks to a cached page on Google, one of Claria's press releases can still be found on TCV's website.

We checked in with TCV to get the full story. Turns out, according to partner John Drew, that TCV's investment in Gator was made in March 2000, back at a time when Gator was merely an e-wallet company, before it began pushing its adware product (indeed, we used it for a while, but stopped in 2002). TCV never took a board seat on the company, and didn't participate in any of the company's deliberations as it moved toward adware, and hasn't had any involvement with the company for some time, Drew said. "They morphed their business model into a different kind of business model," said Drew. Even the TCV partner who made the Gator investment hasnāt been with the firm for three years, he said. "Weāve got Gator stock, and if you want to buy it, Iāll sell it to you," Drew told us. "Itās illiquid," he said of TCV's ownership stake in Gator. Gator is still a private company, and so TCV can't get rid of it easily.

As for Webroot, Drew said TCV is "very active" with its direction. He and partner Jake Reynolds are both on the board. "Is there a conflict? Certainly not in anything we do, day in and day out. Is there a concern that there is an appearance of conflict? Yes." Apparently, Webroot's management was so concerned about it that it didnāt want TCV to lead its venture round. Drew and Reynolds then offered to take the Gator reference off their Web site.

It is true, there's more behind the complex VC relationships in Silicon Valley than what first meets the eye. But a lot of times, it's not all that sinister.

UPDATE: Kind of interesting to see how the public relations world grapples with developments on the b'sphere. See Nolan's response to TCV response.



Comments

Heads-up: IE7 is "likely" going to have RSS aggregation:

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,1995,1776290,00.asp

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,1995,1776182,00.asp

Longtime Reader on March 15, 2005 5:35 PM
Comment link

Here's the problem with TCV's argument:

TCV says they invested in Gator "several years ago when the company was The Gator Corporation and played in the e-wallet market." The suggestion is that Gator's business has changed completely -- that when TCV invested in Gator, Gator was just an e-wallet company, not a spyware/adware company, not a pop-up ad company. (The implication: TCV wouldn't have invested in Gator had TCV known about Gator's monitoring and advertising plans.)

Is it true that Gator's monitoring and advertising weren't known as of 2000? I don't think so. See http://web.archive.org/web/20000229194348/www.gator.com/help/eula.html , archiving Gator's EULA as of February 2000. "Gator.com will seek out high-value offers and great deals from commercial partners that match your interests. Gator.com will provide this Service to you via email or through 'GatorGrams' or another proprietary instrument of Gator.com." Lots of euphemisms here. But the underlying practice is clear: Gator will watch what users do, and show advertisements ("offers") accordingly.

Fact is, TCV invested in Gator at a time when available public information indicated what Gator had in mind. There may or may not be a genuine conflict -- e.g. a PR problem -- between TCV's investment in Gator and its investment in Webroot. But I don't see how TCV can claim that the Gator they invested in wasn't the Gator we all now know. The written record indicates otherwise.

Ben Edelman on March 18, 2005 8:27 AM
Comment link

Drew, in case you're reading this, I'd like to buy some of your Gator/Claria stock. Since it's worthless I'd imagine you'd sell for even less than what you got it for. My email address is above.

nitsuj on March 18, 2005 10:27 AM
Comment link

Email address for ya Drew.

nitsuj@gmail.com on March 18, 2005 10:28 AM
Comment link
This thread is closed to new comments.