Uber and Lyft want you banned from using your own self-driving car in urban areas

The rabble can’t be trusted with self-driving cars, and only companies operating fleets of them should be able to use them in dense urban areas.

So say Uber and Lyft, as signatories to a new list of transportation goals developed by a group of international non-governmental organizations and titled “Shared Mobility Principles for Livable Cities.”

Long-considered a futuristic dream, self-driving cars are quickly moving toward widespread deployment, with many companies testing them on California public roads and Google spin-off Waymo planning to launch public ride-sharing with self-driving minivans in Phoenix this year.

In the list of 10 shared-mobility principles, bland generalities predominate — “stakeholder engagement” for example, is considered important — but the groups responsible clearly saved the best for last: According to Principle No. 10, the signatories — which also include other companies involved in transportation as a service — agree that autonomous vehicles in “dense urban areas” should only be operated in fleets.

Get tech news in your inbox weekday mornings. Sign up for the free Good Morning Silicon Valley newsletter.

In language reminiscent of the Second Amendment, Principle No. 10 says it’s “critical” that all self-driving vehicles are “part of shared fleets, well-regulated, and zero emission.”

Here’s why you, dear reader, ought not to be allowed to toodle around downtown San Francisco or central San Jose (or probably anywhere in between if the ride-hailing giants had their druthers) in your own self-driving car, according to Principle No. 10:

“Shared fleets can provide more affordable access to all, maximize public safety and emissions benefits, ensure that maintenance and software upgrades are managed by professionals.”

 

Photo: A vehicle with both Lyft and Uber windshield decals is parked Monday afternoon Dec. 14, 2015, near Fisherman’s Wharf in San Francisco. (Karl Mondon/Bay Area News Group)

 

Tags: , , , , ,

 

Share this Post



 
 
 
  • Richard Birecki

    Very excited about the prospects of not having to drive. Many externalities to driverless cars– Here’s an interesting column on how it will affect real estate prices. http://me.richtrek.com/2015/09/why-buying-real-estate-in-los-angeles.html interesting theory, agree or disagree

  • Ken Poole

    This sounds very much like one of ICLEI’s basic clauses in their template for guiding new smart cities stating that property, land and housing, should not be owned by individuals but by the collective although I’ve never heard that they make a clear definition about what “the collective” is. Now, is it co-incidence that ICLEI is a body that uses non-governmental agencies to help direct local governments to implements their directives.

 
 
css.php