Skip to content

Breaking News

(FILES) A protester with the organization Code Pink wears giant glasses with the message "Stop Spying" as National Security Agency (NSA) Director General Kieth Alexander testifies before the House (Select) Intelligence Committee on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)" on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, in this October 29, 2013, file photo. Federal judge William Pauley in New York ruled on December 17, 2013, that the NSA's mass surveillance of telephone calls is lawful, fanning a legal conflict likely to be decided ultimately by the Supreme Court. Pauley in threw out a petition from the American Civil Liberties Union and said the program was vital in preventing an Al-Qaeda terror attack on American soil. Ten days earlier, however, another federal judge in Washington had deemed that NSA surveillance is probably unconstitutional, laying the groundwork for a protracted series of legal challenges. "The question for this court is whether the government's bulk telephony metadata program is lawful. This court finds it is," said the 54-page ruling published in New York on Friday. The scale by which NSA indiscriminately gathers data on millions of private calls was exposed by intelligence whistleblower Edward Snowden, sparking an international and domestic outcry.  AFP PHOTO/Jim WATSON/FILESJIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images
(FILES) A protester with the organization Code Pink wears giant glasses with the message “Stop Spying” as National Security Agency (NSA) Director General Kieth Alexander testifies before the House (Select) Intelligence Committee on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)” on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, in this October 29, 2013, file photo. Federal judge William Pauley in New York ruled on December 17, 2013, that the NSA’s mass surveillance of telephone calls is lawful, fanning a legal conflict likely to be decided ultimately by the Supreme Court. Pauley in threw out a petition from the American Civil Liberties Union and said the program was vital in preventing an Al-Qaeda terror attack on American soil. Ten days earlier, however, another federal judge in Washington had deemed that NSA surveillance is probably unconstitutional, laying the groundwork for a protracted series of legal challenges. “The question for this court is whether the government’s bulk telephony metadata program is lawful. This court finds it is,” said the 54-page ruling published in New York on Friday. The scale by which NSA indiscriminately gathers data on millions of private calls was exposed by intelligence whistleblower Edward Snowden, sparking an international and domestic outcry. AFP PHOTO/Jim WATSON/FILESJIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

Section 215 of the Patriot Act, which U.S. spy agencies have used to justify mass collection of phone records, is set to expire June 1. The Senate will hold a special session Sunday to try to figure out what to do.

Here s what a coalition of public advocacy, industry and trade groups don t want the Senate to do: pass the FISA Improvements Act of 2015 and the FISA Reform Act of 2015. The measures don t do enough to rein in government spying, the coalition said in a letter dated Thursday and addressed to Mitch McConnell, the Senate Majority Leader, and Harry Reid, the Senate Minority Leader.

The bills would weaken privacy, civil liberties, and the digital economy, the letter says.

The Obama administration has called for action, and quick. It likes the USA Freedom Act, which the House passed earlier this month — but the Senate has rejected it time and again, most recently last week.

Supporters of the USA Freedom Act say it would end bulk collection of domestic phone records, requiring the government to ask for specific records from phone companies.The tech industry last fall voiced support for the bill. But The Intercept notes that opponents say the bill might actually codify bulk collection. And public advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation pulled its support for the measure and went neutral after a recent court ruling declaring the bulk phone records collection illegal, saying lawmakers should strengthen the act.

Some just want Congress to let the Patriot Act s surveillance provisions expire. Hillicon Valley reports that thousands of websites are protesting the Patriot Act by blocking traffic from Congress. If visitors to the websites use IP addresses from Congress, they are redirected to a protest page that reads Congress: this is a blackout. We are blocking your access until you end mass surveillance laws. You have presented Americans with the false dichotomy of reauthorizing the PATRIOT Act or passing the USA Freedom Act. The real answer is to end all authorities used to conduct mass surveillance.

 

Photo from Associated Press archives